I had no idea that Karen Davis had gone after you, too! Chicana Feminista wrote antagonistic comments about me after Karen Davis defamed me, and after whats-er-name contacted my sons and ex husband (the one who claims to be me, the mother of my sons). I used to believe KD and Chicana had women's concerns foremost in their minds. The truth will out. I suggest that all channels doing live streams ban KD and CF from making comments and block them from your channel. They use real women's real work to aggradize themselves. Looks like you've done a good job, TT, in preventing harm to yourself. While Karen Davis did have my actual address at one time, I do not fear her, because I know how disorganized she is. Be well and let your cozy holiday evenings happen.
I remember when the stuff with you and Karen was all going down - I was aghast, after I had spent hours listening to your interviews with her - such a betrayal. Seemed like a cliquish thing, not anything of substance, which made it worse.
Thanks. That sounds about right. I cannot tell you how many hours she kept me on the phone, planning these interviews, me pleading with her to stop attacking individuals by name in her uniquely derogatory way because it doesn't help our cause. So many people have anger problems! She started reminding me of Neddy, my ex, with her ludicrous accusations. What she and that California nudnik did involving my sons was despicable, and it does not surprise me she and CF contact individuals they thought were your relatives. Be well, take a walk in nature every change you get. Being well and whole despite the crossdressers (I use behavioral descriptons) and the KDs and CFs of the world. They are the ones who have to live with themselves.
I thought I had reached out about it but maybe I just intended to. Yes she's made several streams about me, saying the same stuff she said about you basically, painting me as a confused parasocial alcoholic who had completely imagined a friendship. She went as far as to say we had never hung out or emailed regularly. When I posted the picture from our hangout, which was not for content or part of a larger event, as well as some of the email subject headings, she accused me of doxxing her email (she'd posted it herself on her substack) and said the emails have to happen weekly for it to count as regular or friendship level. She also claimed I had unreasonably dragged her into the conflict with chicana (the conflict being I don't want to interact with her and she can't accept that) so how dare I, when we had a long history of letting each other know when they're talking to a known problem commenter. She'd contacted me last year objecting to my talking to some other people because she was worried it would change how I saw her. In my opinion at this point she's clearly a pattern abuser and she has a particular kind of woman she likes to go after.
I was curious how they'd respond, so I asked CF point blank during KD's latest livestream if you are lying. Still don't know for sure what happened (please don't be offended, just trying to be as objective as possible), but I'm certainly not inclined to believe that crowd was being truthful. I also noticed someone had doxxed
your full name in the live chat & I asked why the moderator hadn't removed it & why they'd think it's okay to not to. Anyway, I thought you might get a kick out the farewell comment I ended up leaving:
Name-calling & time-out for anyone who asks CF direct questions about the alleged harassing pictures & threatening messages instead of reflexively believing only her version of the story is all the more suspicious to those of us who bother to attempt to discern who the bad actors actually are in any given situation (could be one side, both sides, or neither, as sometimes people misinterpret things & have misunderstandings). I had made it very clear that I had yet to come to any conclusions, but I was treated as if I were taking a side simply by stating what allegations were made & asking the accused if they are lies. Of course, this ejection wasn't truly "time out," as it never actually ended; it was really a "kick-out," despite the language game that was being played (the IRONY😂).
Either way, all of this VERY public & petty name-calling & vitriolic hatred, which was flying back & forth all over the place in the wake of agp-gate, was appallingly embarrassing to rational-mided women who just want the normies to FINALLY take this issue seriously enough. All this toxic behavior isnt helping. Clearly if you have to kick me out to avoid having that conversation, you & your crowd are not serious people. I don't have that kind of time to waste with nonsense, so I'm sure you'll be very happy to hear that I've unsubbed so that you may get on with preaching to your own choir with out any pesky disruption by serious questions, let alone any whiff of dissention from the preferred drama narrative, god forbid😱
Though maybe I need to defend them to you as well ... 😉🙂 You might note from their Glossary that they do more or less clearly differentiate between sex and gender:
I'm not sure what in this post made you think about this. Claire Graham is one person with some connection to Genspect but I don't think she necessarily represents Genspect.
ICYMI from the Genspect Team page that I'd posted above:
"Claire Graham is a qualified teacher, with over 20 years’ experience, who now works in SEND education in the UK. She is also an 'intersex'/DSD advocate."
Generally think Genspect have the high ground -- particularly in differentiating between sex and gender, even if many under that umbrella haven't gotten that memo. But some reason to think there are a few flies in the ointment.
She was asking people for information about Chris' family back in September and complaining his family weren't visible enough to trust him. Looked like she was fishing for info given the size of her platform and it was disturbing. She also pretended not to have heard of me when we'd even met at WDI the week before and told the people who were understandably surprised by this that they sounded like cult members. She said I must just like arguing with women to be confused by why she was making posts like this:
You’d think that MM would know that people who dare to speak against this most evil of all ideologies are marked for violence by the TRAlibans. J.K. Rowling, Posie Parker, Helen Joyce, Abigail Shrier, Graham Linehan, Matt Walsh, you, of course, are just a few people we know of who have to employ security guards – some full-time – for themselves and their families. And MM expects Chris to advertise who his family are to these lunatics.
Chris does some very gutsy advocating. With the ferociousness of the traliban it would be a very sane thing to do too solidly keep the lid on his private live, especially for the sake of his children. It’s good to be critical and weary of plants, but maybe it could have been handled a bit better than asking for intel. Maybe just ask people who’ve worked with him for their opinions and what they base this on.
He's had his arm broken and was thrown across a field by a TRA in the middle of an interview. How the hell much is the secretive dark money check to put up with that to "be a plant?"
We complain when TRAs make statements without evidence. Why should we accept it from our own side? Disappointed that she keeps insisting she is right and others are wrong, no matter what they say. No one should be so entrenched in their position that they aren't prepared to listen to and consider other views.
Chris has been beaten up many times. I think he does good stuff. I saw the vid of him talking to deluded kids in Glasgow. He's very sharp. If he's a 'plant' then we need more plants.
She was asking people for information about Chris' family back in September and complaining his family weren't visible enough to trust him. Looked like she was fishing for info given the size of her platform and it was disturbing. She also pretended not to have heard of me when we'd even met at WDI the week before and told the people who were understandably surprised by this that they sounded like cult members. She said I must just like arguing with women, to be confused by why she was making posts like this:
I’m so sorry that you have to face this kind of immature behaviors and threats. I simply don’t get people behaving like this after their 30’s. Your work is, and will be, important.
I am a happy supporter and hope this kind of low stuff stops happening to you.
She posted to Twitter that she thinks a lot of my issues were because I didn't date enough in high school. Just given that that's something I literally never talked about on social media, and that she's talking about somebody who was a minor for all but the last 2 months of high school, it's just weird.
That's messed up. She's starting to sound unhinged now. I've been in a couple of live streams when KD shows up in the live chat, and other's in there start talking like sycophants at her mere presence. It's cringey AF, and I get second hand embarrassment when that happens.
"doxxed last year by DSD gender identity activist Claire Graham". Really?
"On the twelfth day of Christmas my true love gave to me ..." 😉🙂
I thought you two were best buds, comrades in arms on the barricades. 🙂 She is fairly knowledgeable about DSDs, but rather narrow-minded and dogmatic herself -- I'd tangled with her some years ago, though I was somewhat mistaken for which I'd more or less apologized:
No, she hates me for exposing the DSD charity she's affiliated with for posting a home dilation guide aimed at minors and linking children to a different site that had detailed explanations about sexual topics including at what age to start sending nudes of yourself to a partner, on a website that was explicitly aimed at people who were 14. The video series is called clairevoyance. Following my expose of this UK charity, the links to the inappropriate off-site content were removed but the dilation guide remains. The guide is aimed at minors teaching them how to dilate alone and through the pain explicitly for a sexual reason not because it's medically necessary. I also have sources that document that it doesn't benefit them in terms of ability to achieve the same degree of dilation whether they're 14 18 or 30. So there's no reason for kids to be attempting this and a lot of reasons for them not to be.
Thanks. I managed to find the Genspect video and the DSDTeens page, but would have to read/watch more of both before being able to comment much on your own video:
However, in skimming over your video, particularly the closing bits, it does seem that DSDTeens are leaning towards "gender-affirmation care", a rather egregious euphemism right out of the chute.
However, I'm substantially more interested in your criticisms of Graham, particularly in the first minute or so:
"... Graham has absolutely no idea about what makes sex sex ...
... dodged the question of what makes you male ...
... she never wants to define the sex classes in terms of their reproductive function, and instead whenever the subject comes up she's suddenly a female atheist [?? 🙂], meaning she doesn't believe in females. She thinks it's a construct that humans made up ....??"
You have a transcript? But I wonder exactly how you would define those "sex classes in terms of their reproductive function". And whether you would accept the standard biological definitions for the sexes that define those categories in precisely those terms:
Though I suppose one might reasonably debate which functions are the essential ones, but some solid justifications for the ones central to those definitions.
That really doesn't answer my questions -- maybe you don't want to answer them, or maybe you can't?
But by those standard biological definitions, those CAIS people are sexLESS, neither male nor female. Too many in this clusterfuck -- on all sides, including most TRAs, feminists, "biologists", and "philosophers" -- stumble over that hurdle and idea. Pots and kettles.
They tried to send a wellness check a few months ago but they only had my PO Box address. Someone claiming to be an officer called my phone and tried to get me to give them my apartment or meet them at some location away from my apartment to "make sure I'm safe." I said no and hung up.
ICYMI, I'm sure you'll appreciate Stella O'Malley's recent response to my comment and Note ...
Stella O'Malley: "I couldn't agree more. The conflation of sex and gender - and the subconscious conflation of being gay with being akin to being trans - has caused a massive level of confusion."
strange days indeed. Realising Karen Davis is batshit crazy I stopped supporting her 2 years ago. Another one of her ilk is Brittany Roux who has lately been trashing Helen Joyce. Last night I had an online altercation on Julie Bindels Substack with a woman who called me a GC cultist because I defended Kellie-Jay Keene when she called KJK a homophobe and ultra conservative who wanted all women married and staying at home. Thats only a few hyperboles away from saying KJK is a far right nazi bigot!...theres some weirdos around.
Unfortunately, or not, pretty much everyone has some articles of faith and unexamined assumptions -- present company excepted, of course ... 😉🙂 -- that they are unwilling to abandon or even reconsider. Fer instance, Davis and Company have made some common cause with Matt Walsh, while having a few more or less credible criticisms of the "gender critical" cohort. Still rather too many feminists -- of all stripes -- who are unwilling to consider their own contributions to the transgender clusterfuck. See my:
Non feminists are also unwilling to consider that feminists have put up the strongest and oldest opposition to the trans movement. Instead they pretend we've done nothing.
Cheerfully ready to concede that "feminists" in general have done much to advance women's rights, one way or another. Have often quoted, in full agreement with, a rather famous Canadian suffragette, Nellie McClung, who was part of the movement to get women the vote:
Probably why most Muslim countries are such basket cases.
But that doesn't mean that all feminists are beyond reproach, much less walk on water. A great deal of ideological claptrap in much of feminism that y'all might want to give some serious thought to. Much of which has contributed to the transgenderism that many are quite reasonably railing against -- not for nothing did Helen Dale & Lorenzo Warby argue that the "transcult is the bastard child [of some sects] of feminism":
Though some of their arguments are somewhat "overwrought", if not very wide of the mark. But Dale has also quoted Maya Forstater saying, with some justification, that "hostility to evolution is feminism's Achilles' Heel":
I'm so sorry this happened to you. I am glad you are safe now, and my wishes for your continued safety in the next year and beyond. <3
I, too, am so very sorry this happened to you.
I had no idea that Karen Davis had gone after you, too! Chicana Feminista wrote antagonistic comments about me after Karen Davis defamed me, and after whats-er-name contacted my sons and ex husband (the one who claims to be me, the mother of my sons). I used to believe KD and Chicana had women's concerns foremost in their minds. The truth will out. I suggest that all channels doing live streams ban KD and CF from making comments and block them from your channel. They use real women's real work to aggradize themselves. Looks like you've done a good job, TT, in preventing harm to yourself. While Karen Davis did have my actual address at one time, I do not fear her, because I know how disorganized she is. Be well and let your cozy holiday evenings happen.
I remember when the stuff with you and Karen was all going down - I was aghast, after I had spent hours listening to your interviews with her - such a betrayal. Seemed like a cliquish thing, not anything of substance, which made it worse.
She tried to downplay how many interviews they'd done. A woman in my Discord set about to count them and came back with 24.
Thanks. That sounds about right. I cannot tell you how many hours she kept me on the phone, planning these interviews, me pleading with her to stop attacking individuals by name in her uniquely derogatory way because it doesn't help our cause. So many people have anger problems! She started reminding me of Neddy, my ex, with her ludicrous accusations. What she and that California nudnik did involving my sons was despicable, and it does not surprise me she and CF contact individuals they thought were your relatives. Be well, take a walk in nature every change you get. Being well and whole despite the crossdressers (I use behavioral descriptons) and the KDs and CFs of the world. They are the ones who have to live with themselves.
Off topic, but my bubbie's cat was named nudnik.
I thought I had reached out about it but maybe I just intended to. Yes she's made several streams about me, saying the same stuff she said about you basically, painting me as a confused parasocial alcoholic who had completely imagined a friendship. She went as far as to say we had never hung out or emailed regularly. When I posted the picture from our hangout, which was not for content or part of a larger event, as well as some of the email subject headings, she accused me of doxxing her email (she'd posted it herself on her substack) and said the emails have to happen weekly for it to count as regular or friendship level. She also claimed I had unreasonably dragged her into the conflict with chicana (the conflict being I don't want to interact with her and she can't accept that) so how dare I, when we had a long history of letting each other know when they're talking to a known problem commenter. She'd contacted me last year objecting to my talking to some other people because she was worried it would change how I saw her. In my opinion at this point she's clearly a pattern abuser and she has a particular kind of woman she likes to go after.
I was curious how they'd respond, so I asked CF point blank during KD's latest livestream if you are lying. Still don't know for sure what happened (please don't be offended, just trying to be as objective as possible), but I'm certainly not inclined to believe that crowd was being truthful. I also noticed someone had doxxed
your full name in the live chat & I asked why the moderator hadn't removed it & why they'd think it's okay to not to. Anyway, I thought you might get a kick out the farewell comment I ended up leaving:
Name-calling & time-out for anyone who asks CF direct questions about the alleged harassing pictures & threatening messages instead of reflexively believing only her version of the story is all the more suspicious to those of us who bother to attempt to discern who the bad actors actually are in any given situation (could be one side, both sides, or neither, as sometimes people misinterpret things & have misunderstandings). I had made it very clear that I had yet to come to any conclusions, but I was treated as if I were taking a side simply by stating what allegations were made & asking the accused if they are lies. Of course, this ejection wasn't truly "time out," as it never actually ended; it was really a "kick-out," despite the language game that was being played (the IRONY😂).
Either way, all of this VERY public & petty name-calling & vitriolic hatred, which was flying back & forth all over the place in the wake of agp-gate, was appallingly embarrassing to rational-mided women who just want the normies to FINALLY take this issue seriously enough. All this toxic behavior isnt helping. Clearly if you have to kick me out to avoid having that conversation, you & your crowd are not serious people. I don't have that kind of time to waste with nonsense, so I'm sure you'll be very happy to hear that I've unsubbed so that you may get on with preaching to your own choir with out any pesky disruption by serious questions, let alone any whiff of dissention from the preferred drama narrative, god forbid😱
She bragged about it at length on her channel and posted screenshots herself. Karen is gaslighting everyone.
She's clearly a clown 🤡
Just glad I found out BEFORE donating 😂
Davis once accused me of being a "Genspect True Believer" for defending them:
https://ykright.substack.com/p/castrate-agp-kids-says-anne-lawrence/comment/11112787
Though maybe I need to defend them to you as well ... 😉🙂 You might note from their Glossary that they do more or less clearly differentiate between sex and gender:
https://genspect.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/The-Gender-Framework-Draft-One.pdf
I'm not sure what in this post made you think about this. Claire Graham is one person with some connection to Genspect but I don't think she necessarily represents Genspect.
I was responding to Ute's comment about Karen Davis, not Claire Graham.
But you're right about Graham's connection to Genspect which I'd forgotten about:
https://genspect.org/meet-the-team/
I think she is British, and claims to be intersex....?
ICYMI from the Genspect Team page that I'd posted above:
"Claire Graham is a qualified teacher, with over 20 years’ experience, who now works in SEND education in the UK. She is also an 'intersex'/DSD advocate."
Generally think Genspect have the high ground -- particularly in differentiating between sex and gender, even if many under that umbrella haven't gotten that memo. But some reason to think there are a few flies in the ointment.
Wait… Megan Murphy did what?
She was asking people for information about Chris' family back in September and complaining his family weren't visible enough to trust him. Looked like she was fishing for info given the size of her platform and it was disturbing. She also pretended not to have heard of me when we'd even met at WDI the week before and told the people who were understandably surprised by this that they sounded like cult members. She said I must just like arguing with women to be confused by why she was making posts like this:
https://twitter.com/MeghanEMurphy/status/1706182795633332700?t=I3R7LfA4uyHCdPWPDnSPYA&s=19
You’d think that MM would know that people who dare to speak against this most evil of all ideologies are marked for violence by the TRAlibans. J.K. Rowling, Posie Parker, Helen Joyce, Abigail Shrier, Graham Linehan, Matt Walsh, you, of course, are just a few people we know of who have to employ security guards – some full-time – for themselves and their families. And MM expects Chris to advertise who his family are to these lunatics.
Chris does some very gutsy advocating. With the ferociousness of the traliban it would be a very sane thing to do too solidly keep the lid on his private live, especially for the sake of his children. It’s good to be critical and weary of plants, but maybe it could have been handled a bit better than asking for intel. Maybe just ask people who’ve worked with him for their opinions and what they base this on.
He's had his arm broken and was thrown across a field by a TRA in the middle of an interview. How the hell much is the secretive dark money check to put up with that to "be a plant?"
We complain when TRAs make statements without evidence. Why should we accept it from our own side? Disappointed that she keeps insisting she is right and others are wrong, no matter what they say. No one should be so entrenched in their position that they aren't prepared to listen to and consider other views.
Chris has been beaten up many times. I think he does good stuff. I saw the vid of him talking to deluded kids in Glasgow. He's very sharp. If he's a 'plant' then we need more plants.
Very sorry this happened and glad it wasn't worse.
Can you elaborate on the Meghan Murphy / Billboard Chris incident?
She was asking people for information about Chris' family back in September and complaining his family weren't visible enough to trust him. Looked like she was fishing for info given the size of her platform and it was disturbing. She also pretended not to have heard of me when we'd even met at WDI the week before and told the people who were understandably surprised by this that they sounded like cult members. She said I must just like arguing with women, to be confused by why she was making posts like this:
https://twitter.com/MeghanEMurphy/status/1706182795633332700?t=I3R7LfA4uyHCdPWPDnSPYA&s=19
What a bunch of c##ts. 🤬.
Very sorry to hear that these cretins threatened you, Exulansic. Good to know you are safe and continuing your important work.
So sorry that this happened to you. It is disappointing, for sure.
I’m so sorry that you have to face this kind of immature behaviors and threats. I simply don’t get people behaving like this after their 30’s. Your work is, and will be, important.
I am a happy supporter and hope this kind of low stuff stops happening to you.
🙏🏻❤️
KD comes off very conniving - big mean girl energy. I'm so sorry you're having to deal with these terrifying stalkers.
She posted to Twitter that she thinks a lot of my issues were because I didn't date enough in high school. Just given that that's something I literally never talked about on social media, and that she's talking about somebody who was a minor for all but the last 2 months of high school, it's just weird.
That's messed up. She's starting to sound unhinged now. I've been in a couple of live streams when KD shows up in the live chat, and other's in there start talking like sycophants at her mere presence. It's cringey AF, and I get second hand embarrassment when that happens.
"doxxed last year by DSD gender identity activist Claire Graham". Really?
"On the twelfth day of Christmas my true love gave to me ..." 😉🙂
I thought you two were best buds, comrades in arms on the barricades. 🙂 She is fairly knowledgeable about DSDs, but rather narrow-minded and dogmatic herself -- I'd tangled with her some years ago, though I was somewhat mistaken for which I'd more or less apologized:
https://humanuseofhumanbeings.substack.com/p/the-imperative-of-categories
Though that was when she was tweeting as Mrkhtake2, an account which has now been deleted:
https://mrkhvoice.com/index.php/2019/07/27/a-tale-of-twitter/
No, she hates me for exposing the DSD charity she's affiliated with for posting a home dilation guide aimed at minors and linking children to a different site that had detailed explanations about sexual topics including at what age to start sending nudes of yourself to a partner, on a website that was explicitly aimed at people who were 14. The video series is called clairevoyance. Following my expose of this UK charity, the links to the inappropriate off-site content were removed but the dilation guide remains. The guide is aimed at minors teaching them how to dilate alone and through the pain explicitly for a sexual reason not because it's medically necessary. I also have sources that document that it doesn't benefit them in terms of ability to achieve the same degree of dilation whether they're 14 18 or 30. So there's no reason for kids to be attempting this and a lot of reasons for them not to be.
I remember now, this going down with Graham about 3 or 4 years ago.
So it seems she is bitter and twisted that you showed her up and now she wants revenge by harming you. Horrible!
You don't know the half of it. The hinge was a distant memory. And actually this all happened starting February 2022.
I remember. At least it's not your current address. This year hasn't been so great. Let me know if you need anything. 💚
Don't see anything on Googling -- you have any links?
Though I'd thought that the dilation was only required for transwomen with their "neo-vaginas"; you seem to suggest otherwise.
https://odysee.com/@Exulansic:d/Clairevoyance:e
It is sometimes done by women for both medical and non-medical reasons. It is not something only trans women do.
Thanks. I managed to find the Genspect video and the DSDTeens page, but would have to read/watch more of both before being able to comment much on your own video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKKiY2p3PSA
https://www.dsdteens.org/puberty-and-you/your-puberty-by-condition/girls/swyers-syndrome-complete-gonadal-dysgensis/
However, in skimming over your video, particularly the closing bits, it does seem that DSDTeens are leaning towards "gender-affirmation care", a rather egregious euphemism right out of the chute.
However, I'm substantially more interested in your criticisms of Graham, particularly in the first minute or so:
"... Graham has absolutely no idea about what makes sex sex ...
... dodged the question of what makes you male ...
... she never wants to define the sex classes in terms of their reproductive function, and instead whenever the subject comes up she's suddenly a female atheist [?? 🙂], meaning she doesn't believe in females. She thinks it's a construct that humans made up ....??"
You have a transcript? But I wonder exactly how you would define those "sex classes in terms of their reproductive function". And whether you would accept the standard biological definitions for the sexes that define those categories in precisely those terms:
https://academic.oup.com/molehr/article/20/12/1161/1062990 (see the Glossary)
https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3063-1
https://web.archive.org/web/20181020204521/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/female
https://web.archive.org/web/20190608135422/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/male
https://twitter.com/pwkilleen/status/1039879009407037441 (Oxford Dictionary of Biology)
Though I suppose one might reasonably debate which functions are the essential ones, but some solid justifications for the ones central to those definitions.
I made at least some of these prior to discovering her acknowledgment in past interviews that 46XY CAIS was a male DSD.
That really doesn't answer my questions -- maybe you don't want to answer them, or maybe you can't?
But by those standard biological definitions, those CAIS people are sexLESS, neither male nor female. Too many in this clusterfuck -- on all sides, including most TRAs, feminists, "biologists", and "philosophers" -- stumble over that hurdle and idea. Pots and kettles.
Even a #faildoxx counts as harassment. Someone tried to SWAT me years ago, and while they failed, it was still harassment.
They tried to send a wellness check a few months ago but they only had my PO Box address. Someone claiming to be an officer called my phone and tried to get me to give them my apartment or meet them at some location away from my apartment to "make sure I'm safe." I said no and hung up.
ICYMI, I'm sure you'll appreciate Stella O'Malley's recent response to my comment and Note ...
Stella O'Malley: "I couldn't agree more. The conflation of sex and gender - and the subconscious conflation of being gay with being akin to being trans - has caused a massive level of confusion."
https://stellaomalley.substack.com/p/parenting-the-gender-distressed-child/comment/46267163
You're more a part of that problem than of the solution there mate ...
strange days indeed. Realising Karen Davis is batshit crazy I stopped supporting her 2 years ago. Another one of her ilk is Brittany Roux who has lately been trashing Helen Joyce. Last night I had an online altercation on Julie Bindels Substack with a woman who called me a GC cultist because I defended Kellie-Jay Keene when she called KJK a homophobe and ultra conservative who wanted all women married and staying at home. Thats only a few hyperboles away from saying KJK is a far right nazi bigot!...theres some weirdos around.
Politics and strange bedfellows ... 😉🙂
Unfortunately, or not, pretty much everyone has some articles of faith and unexamined assumptions -- present company excepted, of course ... 😉🙂 -- that they are unwilling to abandon or even reconsider. Fer instance, Davis and Company have made some common cause with Matt Walsh, while having a few more or less credible criticisms of the "gender critical" cohort. Still rather too many feminists -- of all stripes -- who are unwilling to consider their own contributions to the transgender clusterfuck. See my:
https://ykright.substack.com/p/matt-walsh-accuses-feminists-of-whining/comment/17140129
And:
https://elizamondegreen.substack.com/p/the-year-in-genderhacked-part-one/comment/46078030
Non feminists are also unwilling to consider that feminists have put up the strongest and oldest opposition to the trans movement. Instead they pretend we've done nothing.
#NotAllNonFeminists ... 😉🙂
Cheerfully ready to concede that "feminists" in general have done much to advance women's rights, one way or another. Have often quoted, in full agreement with, a rather famous Canadian suffragette, Nellie McClung, who was part of the movement to get women the vote:
“No nation rises higher than its women”
https://isabelmetcalfe.ca/enduring-spirit-of-the-famous-5/
Probably why most Muslim countries are such basket cases.
But that doesn't mean that all feminists are beyond reproach, much less walk on water. A great deal of ideological claptrap in much of feminism that y'all might want to give some serious thought to. Much of which has contributed to the transgenderism that many are quite reasonably railing against -- not for nothing did Helen Dale & Lorenzo Warby argue that the "transcult is the bastard child [of some sects] of feminism":
https://www.notonyourteam.co.uk/p/a-common-humanity-or-bust
Though some of their arguments are somewhat "overwrought", if not very wide of the mark. But Dale has also quoted Maya Forstater saying, with some justification, that "hostility to evolution is feminism's Achilles' Heel":
https://www.notonyourteam.co.uk/p/questions-on-a-postcard/comment/36813974
Credit where credit is due. But likewise with criticism.
Woah! So sorry this happened. I am glad you are safe & please keep doing what you are doing a lot of people appreciate it.
Can you not go to the police or the FBI? Sounds almost like RICO.