Since I pointed out that there is a fundamental distinction between having and not having a disorder of sexual development - or more accurately, having THE typical or AN atypical developmental path - I have encountered some hysterical opposition.
Facts and reasonableness. Women MUST deny the demands of submission to “special” and “hurt feelings”. Biologically typical women exist, we matter, we must fight for ourselves as Exulansic asserts.
Biological variations have always occurred throughout populations, not limited to disorders of sexual development. These people opposing Exulansic are not more special than others whose bodies exhibit other variations from “the norm”, or even those who have typical bodies but horrific circumstance, or anyone at all. Claire, and others, need to accept their reality themselves, not browbeat others into self denial.
As always, you say it best! I really miss you on YouTube- do you think you’ll be back on? 💪✊
Facts and reasonableness. Women MUST deny the demands of submission to “special” and “hurt feelings”. Biologically typical women exist, we matter, we must fight for ourselves as Exulansic asserts.
Biological variations have always occurred throughout populations, not limited to disorders of sexual development. These people opposing Exulansic are not more special than others whose bodies exhibit other variations from “the norm”, or even those who have typical bodies but horrific circumstance, or anyone at all. Claire, and others, need to accept their reality themselves, not browbeat others into self denial.