She said that once she was pregnant, her hormones did "what they were supposed to do." If she is aware enough to know that hormones exist in a human body for a reason, why did she f*** around with her God-given hormones and fill her female body with more T than it was created to tolerate? What a dullard.
I know of multiple trans people who had gender reveal parties! It was all I could do not to reply "how do you know? They said 'it's a girl!' when you were born, too..."
Here’s a thought- does anyone think that her male partner will stick around once she has her bottom surgery??? Who knows, but the chances of her daughter growing up in a 2 parent home doesn’t look good to me. Also, I had 4 babies and suffered from postpartum depression ( in lesser degrees with each pregnancy) I wish I had “a kit” under my bed to get rid of those debilitating symptoms! I had to go to therapy and take meds which all took a lot of time! Being pregnant was my first and only introduction to the unbelievably powerful effects of hormones.
I saw a kinda gross thread a while back (I think someone screenshot a post from Reddit and posted it on Twitter) of a straight guy saying his girlfriend id-ed as trans, but b/c he enjoyed the sex with her so much, he could overlook her facial/body hair. He basically said he hoped she'd put off surgery as long as possible b/c he'd absolutely peace out at that point.
I think being in a single parent home is the very least of that kid's future problems. The real problem is that even in a 2 parent home it's one delusional female nutter on T and heavy psych meds plus the kind of man who either actively fetishizes that state or is so dominated by her he daren't object or leave doing the parenting. That kid's chances of a decent home life are null.
Helen, absolutely! I was raised by my single mother and we did just fine ( I think 😂)! The dynamics of that household- 2 parents or 1 will be nightmarish, to say the least!
Even if a woman is not taking exogenous T currently, a history of taking exogenous T in the past still can lead to miscarriage, premature and underweight babies because T causes the uterus to lose elasticity permanently - and as a result, the uterus will have trouble expanding enough as pregnancy progresses, particularly in the later stages. No wonder this woman's baby was born "so small" - mom's uterus couldn't expand enough to give the developing child the room it needed to develop to full size.
Also, I believe she is lying when she says she'd have to get her husband's approval to have a hysterectomy. In Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Afghanistan a married woman would have to get her husband's approval before getting a hysterectomy, but not in the USA in 2022. (I had a hysterectomy in the US in the late 1990s, and even though I was married to a man at the time, I certainly did not have to get my partner's approval or permission.)
Finally, I find it absurd that this woman thinks she looks like a man or at least not obviously female. Her hairdo and no-makeup look were very popular and commonly seen amongst women back in the 80s and 90s. In fact, because her hairdo is so easy to take care of & requires very little time to wash and style, it was known back then as "new mom hair" or just plain "mom hair." Like "mom jeans."
I've read many accounts of young women who know they don't want kids getting pushback or refusals from doctors when they request even just getting their tubes tied. It may seem like it's not official policy, but I believe it's still super common. I am surprised they'd push back on someone who considers themselves trans though. Maybe the existence of a husband is always the ruling factor.
And yeah, if I hadn't heard her voice, I would not think she had ever taken testosterone.
Getting the Fallopian tubes "tied" or severed is not the same as or equivalent to hysterectomy, though. Hysterectomy can have a host of lifelong negative health consequences that getting your tubes tied, cauterized or cut does not have.
BTW, it's true that HCPs have always been reluctant to do procedures on girls & young women - and on boys & young men, too - that will make it impossible for them ever to become biological parents later on in life. Because the truth is, many members of both sexes who as kids, teens & young adults are 100% certain they never want kids of their own often change their minds later on.
It's very common for girls & young women in their 20s to be certain they they never want to have kids - many find the idea of ever having children horrifying, in fact. But it's also very common for a good number of those same girls & young women to have a total change of heart when they reach their 30s.
I personally was sure I never wanted kids until I was 33, when suddenly I felt completely different & realized I did want to become a mother after all. This happens all the time. Which is why HCPs have traditionally been very leery of doing procedures on girls & young women that will render them infertile/sterile & which can't be reversed.
Despite what trans activists say, medical gatekeeping isn't always paternalistic and negative - it can be protective and in patients' longterm best interests. IMO, performing surgeries and other medical interventions on young people that will close off their chances of becoming biological parents forever should only be done when absolutely necessary as in the case of young persons requiring, say, chemo, radiation &/or removal of reproductive organs for life-threatening conditions like cancer. There's good reason that surgeries which render minors sterile for no sound medical reason are widely considered an egregious violations of human rights & are against the law in many countries.
Honestly, this trainwreck of a human being and her pathetic husband are directly the result of enthusiastically pandering to the idiocy of psychotic individuals instead of telling them they are sick and delusional and nothing they believe is true and their demands are the result of diseased craziness. If it were anything but gender this may actually happen.
My biggest social media pile-on ever was a reaction exactly like this. And here is the weird part. The woman who led this dogpile worked for the ACLU and in clinic defense, she had built her entire career on knowing and understanding the intimate reality of sperm and egg, yet here she was, accusing me of bigotry for knowing how reproduction works. This is the worst self-harm cult ever because it hurts everyone, even a baby, to "validate" magical thinking.
It has long been known that East German female athletes who were given steroids have given birth to deformed babies at a much higher rate than women who never had such steroids, many years (a decade or more) after they stopped taking those steroids. There is no excuse for doctors not advising their female patients who they know are taking testosterone of this and of the importance of using birth control for penis-in-vagina sex! https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/east-germanys-forgotten-olympic-doping-6949436
ASAP. Her metoidioplasty "keeps opening up" per something posted today and she's getting ghosted by her doctors it sounds like. Baby is 4 months old now and is showing signs of developmental issues including inconsistent/absent reflexes (rooting reflex specifically) as well as reflux so bad she's already on medication for it.
I wonder if having it 4 months after giving birth has anything to do with that. Also... I just can't get over the fact she's having this surgery so soon after giving birth...like...can you focus on your baby for a minute or two?
Your humour is verging on the English hahahaha Not a peddle-file indeed
These are dad jokes, sterotype defied
She said that once she was pregnant, her hormones did "what they were supposed to do." If she is aware enough to know that hormones exist in a human body for a reason, why did she f*** around with her God-given hormones and fill her female body with more T than it was created to tolerate? What a dullard.
Ah, she's on anti-psych meds. What a surprise.
Yeah, couldn't have seen that coming
I remember seeing a study that linked testosterone therapy to a 12% or thereabouts rise in psychosis.
This kid is so fucked.
Ex, you're a secular saint. More power to your elbow, as they say. More power to your truth/mercy mission. More power to your compassion.
"We're having a baby girl." ... Uh oh. Heresy.
I know of multiple trans people who had gender reveal parties! It was all I could do not to reply "how do you know? They said 'it's a girl!' when you were born, too..."
😂🤣🤣
Here’s a thought- does anyone think that her male partner will stick around once she has her bottom surgery??? Who knows, but the chances of her daughter growing up in a 2 parent home doesn’t look good to me. Also, I had 4 babies and suffered from postpartum depression ( in lesser degrees with each pregnancy) I wish I had “a kit” under my bed to get rid of those debilitating symptoms! I had to go to therapy and take meds which all took a lot of time! Being pregnant was my first and only introduction to the unbelievably powerful effects of hormones.
I saw a kinda gross thread a while back (I think someone screenshot a post from Reddit and posted it on Twitter) of a straight guy saying his girlfriend id-ed as trans, but b/c he enjoyed the sex with her so much, he could overlook her facial/body hair. He basically said he hoped she'd put off surgery as long as possible b/c he'd absolutely peace out at that point.
I think being in a single parent home is the very least of that kid's future problems. The real problem is that even in a 2 parent home it's one delusional female nutter on T and heavy psych meds plus the kind of man who either actively fetishizes that state or is so dominated by her he daren't object or leave doing the parenting. That kid's chances of a decent home life are null.
Helen, absolutely! I was raised by my single mother and we did just fine ( I think 😂)! The dynamics of that household- 2 parents or 1 will be nightmarish, to say the least!
omg this is child abuse
Even if a woman is not taking exogenous T currently, a history of taking exogenous T in the past still can lead to miscarriage, premature and underweight babies because T causes the uterus to lose elasticity permanently - and as a result, the uterus will have trouble expanding enough as pregnancy progresses, particularly in the later stages. No wonder this woman's baby was born "so small" - mom's uterus couldn't expand enough to give the developing child the room it needed to develop to full size.
Also, I believe she is lying when she says she'd have to get her husband's approval to have a hysterectomy. In Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Afghanistan a married woman would have to get her husband's approval before getting a hysterectomy, but not in the USA in 2022. (I had a hysterectomy in the US in the late 1990s, and even though I was married to a man at the time, I certainly did not have to get my partner's approval or permission.)
Finally, I find it absurd that this woman thinks she looks like a man or at least not obviously female. Her hairdo and no-makeup look were very popular and commonly seen amongst women back in the 80s and 90s. In fact, because her hairdo is so easy to take care of & requires very little time to wash and style, it was known back then as "new mom hair" or just plain "mom hair." Like "mom jeans."
I've read many accounts of young women who know they don't want kids getting pushback or refusals from doctors when they request even just getting their tubes tied. It may seem like it's not official policy, but I believe it's still super common. I am surprised they'd push back on someone who considers themselves trans though. Maybe the existence of a husband is always the ruling factor.
And yeah, if I hadn't heard her voice, I would not think she had ever taken testosterone.
Getting the Fallopian tubes "tied" or severed is not the same as or equivalent to hysterectomy, though. Hysterectomy can have a host of lifelong negative health consequences that getting your tubes tied, cauterized or cut does not have.
BTW, it's true that HCPs have always been reluctant to do procedures on girls & young women - and on boys & young men, too - that will make it impossible for them ever to become biological parents later on in life. Because the truth is, many members of both sexes who as kids, teens & young adults are 100% certain they never want kids of their own often change their minds later on.
It's very common for girls & young women in their 20s to be certain they they never want to have kids - many find the idea of ever having children horrifying, in fact. But it's also very common for a good number of those same girls & young women to have a total change of heart when they reach their 30s.
I personally was sure I never wanted kids until I was 33, when suddenly I felt completely different & realized I did want to become a mother after all. This happens all the time. Which is why HCPs have traditionally been very leery of doing procedures on girls & young women that will render them infertile/sterile & which can't be reversed.
Despite what trans activists say, medical gatekeeping isn't always paternalistic and negative - it can be protective and in patients' longterm best interests. IMO, performing surgeries and other medical interventions on young people that will close off their chances of becoming biological parents forever should only be done when absolutely necessary as in the case of young persons requiring, say, chemo, radiation &/or removal of reproductive organs for life-threatening conditions like cancer. There's good reason that surgeries which render minors sterile for no sound medical reason are widely considered an egregious violations of human rights & are against the law in many countries.
In addition to the frog voice, she has a joke beard.
You'd think if the docs are so concerned with sterilization, they wouldn't give these young people blockers.
Honestly, this trainwreck of a human being and her pathetic husband are directly the result of enthusiastically pandering to the idiocy of psychotic individuals instead of telling them they are sick and delusional and nothing they believe is true and their demands are the result of diseased craziness. If it were anything but gender this may actually happen.
"Female fetus?" Sounds kinda TERFy to me, surely the correct term is Assigned Female In Utero. 🤪
I can't remember the last time I yelled "idiot!" so many times while watching one of these people, and that's really saying something.
Raw goats milk would help the baby.
Poor baby.
Can we offically retire the word dysphoria? Please?
Good idea! Let’s call it what it is- BULLSHIT!
My biggest social media pile-on ever was a reaction exactly like this. And here is the weird part. The woman who led this dogpile worked for the ACLU and in clinic defense, she had built her entire career on knowing and understanding the intimate reality of sperm and egg, yet here she was, accusing me of bigotry for knowing how reproduction works. This is the worst self-harm cult ever because it hurts everyone, even a baby, to "validate" magical thinking.
ACLU is way captured. Completely the opposite of what it was originally set up for.
It has long been known that East German female athletes who were given steroids have given birth to deformed babies at a much higher rate than women who never had such steroids, many years (a decade or more) after they stopped taking those steroids. There is no excuse for doctors not advising their female patients who they know are taking testosterone of this and of the importance of using birth control for penis-in-vagina sex! https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/east-germanys-forgotten-olympic-doping-6949436
When is part 2 coming out? I need an update on this poor baby
ASAP. Her metoidioplasty "keeps opening up" per something posted today and she's getting ghosted by her doctors it sounds like. Baby is 4 months old now and is showing signs of developmental issues including inconsistent/absent reflexes (rooting reflex specifically) as well as reflux so bad she's already on medication for it.
I wonder if having it 4 months after giving birth has anything to do with that. Also... I just can't get over the fact she's having this surgery so soon after giving birth...like...can you focus on your baby for a minute or two?
Nah. The sheer self absorption of the average trans person is generally off the scale in my observation.