Everyone knows the party of slave ownership apologists is the Republican party, and it has been since the Civil Rights era. When Democrats started supporting Civil Rights, the Dixiecrats switched their loyalty to the Republicans.
Everybody knows the Democrats were the party of slavery during the Civil War. That changed. Oh, and it's the Democratic party, not the "Democrat party."
Have you ever lived in the Projects ? in Section 8 housing ? How about the areas of AOC or the Bronx ., which "vote" Democrats cuz they're always told Republicans will take away their Freebies?
i have. it's Modern Day Slavery to shackle generations into the Welfare System. Dems punish anyone who tries to leave the System. Even the Disabled are punished if they manage to get a job that pays well.
you're rewarded for being a single mom with housing, food, etc ., just enough.
you're given free abortions. NYC has. ore aborted Black babies than live births.
The schools, the Housing, Food, Daycare, Transportation, Gadgets, Internet are all PAID by the System .. if you strive to break free .. there's NO gradual easements .. you're cut off completely.
it's SLAVERY. it's Low Expectations. it's Racist. the more the System condones drugs, promiscuity, consumption of garbage (mind & body) .. the WORSE the communities. it's pure EVIL.
and don't get me started on Communists & Marxists .. my family outran them from China to Africa to EU.
USA is the last FREE nation standing..
Don't believe me? Go live somewhere else & experience it.
Good response to this nonsense narrative they keep making up. There was another similar tweet by a Chron staff member. I al learn gin now, from you, to screenshot these things. It was also deleted after I posted this response. "The force teaming of lesbians with the alphabet mafia, now dominated by heterosexual men and their obsession with being women, denies same-sex attraction, denies first amendment rights, denies our living as lesbians. Such force teaming is the very essence of fascism.”
Cowards can't stand by their words because they know they made this shit up and weren't expecting that they would be challenged.
That's not what Marxist dialectics is. You can no more 'control' the dialectic (are you thinking of semantics?) than you can fly to Mars. Or change sex. Real Marxism (not the made-up bogeyman of cultural marxism that the US right and media talk about, is profoundly opposed to gender ideology as it mires us in individualism, relativism and stops any sort of solidarity across class, sex or race. Funny how the right wing (include Democrats in that) want to scare people off understanding what actual progressive politics might look like. You'd think they had a vested interest.
I'm in the UK and I've worked on the Online Safety Bill which has yet to finish its journey through Parliament. I didn't suggest that semantics (or language or speech) couldn't be, or isn't, controlled. Every society controls what can or cannot be said. We would fall into chaos if they didn't. There's really no such thing as 'free speech' despite the Americans proclaiming it proudly. They too are circumscribed and there's no better regulatory body than one that is self-imposed and the online space is showing us exactly who is allowed to speak and people censor themselves accordingly, governments look on and laugh. But we do need checks and balances, laws that to some degree police the public sphere, and it comes down to which ideology holds sway. Perhaps you're a libertarian?. Many TRAs are too, they're certainly not 'communist' which is where this conversation began. I'm no postmodernist. Quite the opposite, although the initial impulse to deconstruct binaries was a good one but 'there is nothing outside the text' is fundamentally flawed. Many good Marxists have recanted their initial approval of postmodernism as they realised it leaves us unable to 'name' or oppose oppression. Frederic Jameson springs to mind but there are lots more. Even Zizek recanted and also has interesting things to say about gender ideology. Cultural marxism is much misunderstood. Most of its early interests have been absorbed into the mainstream, not because we are living in some lefty nightmare, but because capitalism is large, it contains multitudes and absorbs progressive elements and monetises them, hence the 'pink pound' etc etc ad nauseum.
You've totally misunderstood my point but, ironically revealed what I meant though you didn't mean to. The 'pink pound' is an exploitation of a group of people, I meant it as a criticism of the way capitalism absorbs into itself so-called progressive minority interests and exploits them. The support you needed obviously would not be there in such a system, it's not designed to offer support. I am sorry you have been so poorly treated. You seem quite embittered though and are using the usual bogeymen of 'BAME' as a scapegoat. It's not people like me, or indeed any other minority group, who are your 'enemy'. We are manipulated into blaming others for policies which the State enacts and so they divide and rule. This is the issue also with identity politics, it divides rather than joins together. It sows animosity rather than compassion. And we seem to at least be on the same side (hence why we are both here) when it comes to the biggest identity politics con of all, the trans lobby and the mutilation of children. That it is the mothers taking the children is an interesting observation and I'm sure there are many reasons, not just the obvious Munchausen's by proxy. The rise in female teenagers transing is interesting and horrific too. Anyway, I am tired, my female dog is very ill and I'm not sleeping so I'll end now but I wish you well.
I recommend James Lindsay's podcasts which break down how Maoism utilized a fantasy class system of red versus black identities then as soon as the red guard was no longer useful, they became a political threat and were discarded. I imagine that will happen to trans identities if it gets that far.
Most communist parties worldwide don't. Chinese communists call people like this "báizǔo", which basically means hypocritical virtue-signalling SJW but explicitly from the Left. These are postmodernists who've abandoned materialism completely, which is the foundation of Marxism. They just like the edgy aesthetics and antifascist history of communism without any of the actual politics or work. "Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State" is about as TERFy as it gets, but none of them has read it!
Indeed. Interesting breakdown here from the Communist Party of Great Britain re. the Scottish Gov attempt to get the GRA into law. It supports the 'right' of people to identify but goes on to say:
(quote) when pursued to the exclusion of such considerations as the sex-based rights of women, and the fragmentation of equality legislation across Britain, it undermines the drive to build unity within and between the working class and the oppressed and disadvantaged groups in our society.
The Communist Party is the only political party with a coherent political analysis of sex and gender. Gender as an ideological construct should not be confused or conflated with the material reality of biological sex. Gender is the vehicle through which misogyny is enacted and normalised. Gender identity ideology is well- suited to the needs of the capitalist class, focusing as it does on individual as opposed to collective rights, enabling and supporting the super-exploitation of women. (unquote)
People imagine they know what Marxism is but they usually mean some version dreamt up by the right to scare people.
I don't know why purported communists, who are supposed to be committed to a materialist, anti-capitalist stance, which has historically acknowledged the detriment the patriarchy has visited upon women, would support an anti-materialist, consumerist, patriarchal belief system.
Everyone knows the party of slave ownership apologists is the Republican party, and it has been since the Civil Rights era. When Democrats started supporting Civil Rights, the Dixiecrats switched their loyalty to the Republicans.
Everybody knows the Democrats were the party of slavery during the Civil War. That changed. Oh, and it's the Democratic party, not the "Democrat party."
Have you ever lived in the Projects ? in Section 8 housing ? How about the areas of AOC or the Bronx ., which "vote" Democrats cuz they're always told Republicans will take away their Freebies?
i have. it's Modern Day Slavery to shackle generations into the Welfare System. Dems punish anyone who tries to leave the System. Even the Disabled are punished if they manage to get a job that pays well.
you're rewarded for being a single mom with housing, food, etc ., just enough.
you're given free abortions. NYC has. ore aborted Black babies than live births.
The schools, the Housing, Food, Daycare, Transportation, Gadgets, Internet are all PAID by the System .. if you strive to break free .. there's NO gradual easements .. you're cut off completely.
it's SLAVERY. it's Low Expectations. it's Racist. the more the System condones drugs, promiscuity, consumption of garbage (mind & body) .. the WORSE the communities. it's pure EVIL.
and don't get me started on Communists & Marxists .. my family outran them from China to Africa to EU.
USA is the last FREE nation standing..
Don't believe me? Go live somewhere else & experience it.
Good response to this nonsense narrative they keep making up. There was another similar tweet by a Chron staff member. I al learn gin now, from you, to screenshot these things. It was also deleted after I posted this response. "The force teaming of lesbians with the alphabet mafia, now dominated by heterosexual men and their obsession with being women, denies same-sex attraction, denies first amendment rights, denies our living as lesbians. Such force teaming is the very essence of fascism.”
Cowards can't stand by their words because they know they made this shit up and weren't expecting that they would be challenged.
I did a post about all the various ways they were trying to frame us. https://amandakovattana.substack.com/p/local-press-frames-wdi-as-not-feminists
Why would the Communists support Trans ?? I can't think of ANY political ideology that supports, encourages Trance.
That's not what Marxist dialectics is. You can no more 'control' the dialectic (are you thinking of semantics?) than you can fly to Mars. Or change sex. Real Marxism (not the made-up bogeyman of cultural marxism that the US right and media talk about, is profoundly opposed to gender ideology as it mires us in individualism, relativism and stops any sort of solidarity across class, sex or race. Funny how the right wing (include Democrats in that) want to scare people off understanding what actual progressive politics might look like. You'd think they had a vested interest.
I'm in the UK and I've worked on the Online Safety Bill which has yet to finish its journey through Parliament. I didn't suggest that semantics (or language or speech) couldn't be, or isn't, controlled. Every society controls what can or cannot be said. We would fall into chaos if they didn't. There's really no such thing as 'free speech' despite the Americans proclaiming it proudly. They too are circumscribed and there's no better regulatory body than one that is self-imposed and the online space is showing us exactly who is allowed to speak and people censor themselves accordingly, governments look on and laugh. But we do need checks and balances, laws that to some degree police the public sphere, and it comes down to which ideology holds sway. Perhaps you're a libertarian?. Many TRAs are too, they're certainly not 'communist' which is where this conversation began. I'm no postmodernist. Quite the opposite, although the initial impulse to deconstruct binaries was a good one but 'there is nothing outside the text' is fundamentally flawed. Many good Marxists have recanted their initial approval of postmodernism as they realised it leaves us unable to 'name' or oppose oppression. Frederic Jameson springs to mind but there are lots more. Even Zizek recanted and also has interesting things to say about gender ideology. Cultural marxism is much misunderstood. Most of its early interests have been absorbed into the mainstream, not because we are living in some lefty nightmare, but because capitalism is large, it contains multitudes and absorbs progressive elements and monetises them, hence the 'pink pound' etc etc ad nauseum.
You've totally misunderstood my point but, ironically revealed what I meant though you didn't mean to. The 'pink pound' is an exploitation of a group of people, I meant it as a criticism of the way capitalism absorbs into itself so-called progressive minority interests and exploits them. The support you needed obviously would not be there in such a system, it's not designed to offer support. I am sorry you have been so poorly treated. You seem quite embittered though and are using the usual bogeymen of 'BAME' as a scapegoat. It's not people like me, or indeed any other minority group, who are your 'enemy'. We are manipulated into blaming others for policies which the State enacts and so they divide and rule. This is the issue also with identity politics, it divides rather than joins together. It sows animosity rather than compassion. And we seem to at least be on the same side (hence why we are both here) when it comes to the biggest identity politics con of all, the trans lobby and the mutilation of children. That it is the mothers taking the children is an interesting observation and I'm sure there are many reasons, not just the obvious Munchausen's by proxy. The rise in female teenagers transing is interesting and horrific too. Anyway, I am tired, my female dog is very ill and I'm not sleeping so I'll end now but I wish you well.
I recommend James Lindsay's podcasts which break down how Maoism utilized a fantasy class system of red versus black identities then as soon as the red guard was no longer useful, they became a political threat and were discarded. I imagine that will happen to trans identities if it gets that far.
Most communist parties worldwide don't. Chinese communists call people like this "báizǔo", which basically means hypocritical virtue-signalling SJW but explicitly from the Left. These are postmodernists who've abandoned materialism completely, which is the foundation of Marxism. They just like the edgy aesthetics and antifascist history of communism without any of the actual politics or work. "Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State" is about as TERFy as it gets, but none of them has read it!
Indeed. Interesting breakdown here from the Communist Party of Great Britain re. the Scottish Gov attempt to get the GRA into law. It supports the 'right' of people to identify but goes on to say:
(quote) when pursued to the exclusion of such considerations as the sex-based rights of women, and the fragmentation of equality legislation across Britain, it undermines the drive to build unity within and between the working class and the oppressed and disadvantaged groups in our society.
The Communist Party is the only political party with a coherent political analysis of sex and gender. Gender as an ideological construct should not be confused or conflated with the material reality of biological sex. Gender is the vehicle through which misogyny is enacted and normalised. Gender identity ideology is well- suited to the needs of the capitalist class, focusing as it does on individual as opposed to collective rights, enabling and supporting the super-exploitation of women. (unquote)
People imagine they know what Marxism is but they usually mean some version dreamt up by the right to scare people.
I don't know why purported communists, who are supposed to be committed to a materialist, anti-capitalist stance, which has historically acknowledged the detriment the patriarchy has visited upon women, would support an anti-materialist, consumerist, patriarchal belief system.
cuz it's all the same Puppet Masters.
Can't control an "traditional" population (God, Family, Neighbors, Community) .. só Wealthy "elites" divide, organize, label, cubby, the Plebs.
I also want universal health care but it's even more communist to include elaborate plastic surgery