Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Íris Erlingsdóttir's avatar

I heard you mention "gender atheist" exulansic shirt... Where do I find that?

Expand full comment
Steersman's avatar

"This study is nearly impossible to interpret because the authors don’t bother defining the terms ‘transgender males’ and ‘transgender females.’ However, it looks like the transgender females were actually males who identified as transgender ...."

Part and parcel of the rot that transgenderism has wrought, so to speak. Why there's some merit in deprecating if not anathematizing phrases like "transgender females" and "transgender women" in favour of "transfemales" and "transwomen". The first set -- as adjective-noun pairs -- more or less endorse the claims of those "self-identifying" as such to being members of the categories described and defined by the noun. The second set -- as compound words -- more or less repudiates or rejects such claims. Largely why transactivists get their knickers in a twist at the use of the second set:

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/trans_woman#Usage_notes

Along the same line, you might be amused by this analysis of the too-common use of "gender" to describe the sexes of fish:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03632415.2012.687265

Who knew that fish had personalities? 😉

The only coherent use of "gender" is, largely, only as a synonym for personalities and personality types -- of which there are billions and billions. ICYMI, my kick at the kitty of trying to rationalize the concept of "gender", to put it on more of a scientific footing:

https://humanuseofhumanbeings.substack.com/i/64264079/rationalized-gender

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts