29 Comments
Mar 5Liked by Exulansic

<i>Progesterone and estrogen are also both known to promote the development of adenomas, which means all the single ladies on hormonal birth control should be aware of this as well.</i>

Why just single?

Expand full comment

Gender is not cancer, until it gives you cancer

Expand full comment

You win my prize for obscure condition - pituitary apoplexy. I understood what it was just from the word combination, but it certainly never occured to me the poor gland could die simply by being partially turned off.

I hope the files have a huge impact. This should create protesters swarming any trans-related events.

Expand full comment

Holy. That’s so sad. As someone with a friend who just died from cancer…the thought of people gambling their lives/doctors gambling young people’s lives like this is just…incomprehensible. Why risk your one body.

Expand full comment
founding

Blue dress gate really distracted from so many other more important conversations

Expand full comment

i'm sick of this shit. i've spent most of my life fighting for learning disabled children, mentally handicapped adults & hunting pedos. .. NEVER, in my wildest dreams did i think medical field would do this shit.

mentally ill, me, knows psychiatrists & psychologists are JUST AS SCREWED UP as their WORST patients .. but this ACTIVE destruction of mind, body, soul .. is PURE EVIL.

Expand full comment

Thank you for arming us with knowledge and facts.

Expand full comment

As you know I'm bracha 2 positive. I got the cancer gene from my father. Any extra hormones can increased my already increased risk of some cancers. It's only a matter of time until we hear about a bracha positive teen getting cancer. I hope this one was alright.

Expand full comment

Would I be right in saying that genspect aren’t against transgenderism as such, but they are in opposition to the “affirmation model” and medicalisation, but instead promote therapy and a return to watchful waiting, especially in the case of children? With any medicalisation being only available for informed adults? It would be better than it is now and collating evidence of harm is needed, but for many people it doesn’t go far enough. No one can change sex and the medical industry is profiteering from a harmful lie. If the men hadn’t pushed for female spaces and they hadn’t aggressively lobbied our institutions, I don’t think anyone much would have taken any notice, but they did and we have noticed, so men in dresses stand out like a sore thumb, especially when they are where we don’t expect them to be. Phil in the dress may have brought some clarity.

Expand full comment
Mar 5·edited Mar 5

Awful. The thing that jumped out at me is how the doctor wants to continue "treatment" as much as possible despite the tumors. "Our patient has liver tumors, but we'll totally do a cosmetic mastectomy while they're undergoing treatment to reduce them. That's a reasonable medical thing to do."

Expand full comment

Would love to see you do a full commentary on the WPATH files. I just finished reading the editorial (first 70 pages), and starting to read through the files themselves. It is incredibly damning. In a sane world it should be enough to discredit the entire organization. They are admitting that they are not truly gaining consent of minors, children, mentally ill people and parents. Giving “treatments” to people with DID or psychosis (as long as it’s no active during the doctor’s visit). Admitting that they ultimately don’t see the need for a child’s consent for anything. Discussing how they can branch out into non-“transgender” but GNC kids, offering hormones and surgery as the same as a different set of clothes in order to show off your unique body/identity. Talking about how male children can identify as eunuchs. Admitting that, much like Jazz Jennings, puberty blocked male children ARE in fact made to be eunuchs due to never gaining the ability to orgasm. None of their “standards of care” are remotely based on any scientific evidence or sounds clinical trials. They admit it’s all an unregulated, massively unethical experiment on children and vulnerable adults. In medicine, even if a disease has a 100% fatality rate and you’ve invented a literal cure, you’re required to actually go through with clinical trials to show safety and efficacy. None of this has ever been done. They’re actively blocking study because they know damn well what it will reveal.

Expand full comment