Did DSDFamilies put the sexually inappropriate links to BishUK BACK!?
I really cannot believe the brazen grooming and evasion of accountability.
As some of you may recall, in spring of 2022, I looked into a UK charity called DSDFamilies. When I looked into the DSDfamilies-run website, DSDTeens, I was horrified to find that it was linking children - the site is aimed at 9-14+ year olds - repeatedly to a graphic site full of sexually inappropriate material aimed at exposing children to all kinds of inappropriate and, frankly, dangerous sexual activities. It removed the links when the media was exposing BishUK. Now it appears they’ve put the links BACK!
Here is a taste of what can be found on BishUK. This is the material that DSDTeens and DSDfamilies thinks is appropriate to give to young children, but also wanted to hide when the media is looking. They KNOW it is not appropriate for even a 14 year old:
Inappropriate for children does not begin to cover what I found. And since I did my exposé, the story was picked up by the Daily Mail, sadly without crediting me, and BishUK was revealed more widely as housing inappropriate material for kids. After this scandal broke into mainstream media, DSDFamilies quietly removed their multiple links to BishUK in the fall of 2022, according to the WayBack Machine. I have discovered today that since the scandal died down, the coders at DSDfamilies had the goddamn nerve to put the links back.
Here is the relevant portion of the video I did about how inappropriate BishUK was and how outrageous it was therefore that DSDteens repeatedly linked to it :
Here, today, in 2024, some people I assume are associated with DSDfamilies, are all up on my interview with Stella O’Malley claiming to believe no one should ever safeguard children by investigating a children’s charity that is linking children to websites about sadomasochistic sexual acts and misrepresenting their Tanner stages as somehow a sign of acute arousal. My conclusion, therefore, is that this account is squarely on the side of providing inappropriate sexual material to children. This person is against basic safeguarding and is allergic to accountability.
Even now that BishUK was exposed widely, even after the charity had conceded the point by removing the links, @cais_files is still defending this charity, which has now put the inappropriate links back. They know why they are really against me: I will defend children against predatory individuals and organizations. This account may even be the very person who decided to link children to BishUK in the first place. Know a tree by its fruit. The charity removed the links after BishUK was exposed for a reason. They put the links back quietly for a reason. The reason is they want to expose children on the site to the inappropriate material on BishUK, but they do not want to be caught doing that. They know what they are doing is wrong.
I have attempted to report this charity but I am not able to due to the fact that I am not in the UK. If someone local can help me report or make the report on my behalf, please let me know at my email on Linktr.ee/exulansic.
I cannot possibly understand what is going on here until I achieve (checks notes) "post nut clarity"
This person was in my Twitter replies this AM complaining that you said mean things about them.
Define “Charity”. Most of these charities take donations and use the money to DO MORE OF THE SAME.
The drag queens that read to children use the money to “help people who are gender confused” (or whatever it’s called now), buy makeup, costumes and porn for kids.